actual vs theoretical pv diagram

The main differences between the actual vs theoretical pv diagram of an engine shown in figure. In reality, the theoretical cycle does not occur, and there is always losses associated with actual cycle in every processes. For an actual cycle, the shape of the PV diagram is similar to the theoretical, but the area (work) enclosed by the pV diagram is always less than the ideal value. 

actual vs theoretical pv diagram

In the world of mechanical engineering, 4-stroke petrol engines are the powerhouses that drive our vehicles and machinery. Understanding how these engines work involves looking at a handy tool called the Pressure-Volume (P-V) diagram. But let’s examine it and compare the performance of the actual engine to the theoretical model.

Theoretical P-V Diagram: 

Think of the theoretical P-V diagram as the engine’s ideal diagram. This cycle has four phases: intake, compression, power, and exhaust strokes. In a dream scenario, everything happens according to the strict laws of thermodynamics. The air-fuel mixture compresses and expands without losses, a beautifully symmetrical and ultra-efficient P-V diagram.

Actual P-V Diagram: Where Reality Steps In While Working Of An Engine And PV Diagram Will Get Different

In the actual world, our 4-stroke petrol engines face challenges that prevent them from perfectly matching the theoretical model. Here are the main factors causing the differences between the theoretical diagram and actual P-V diagrams:

  1. Friction and Heat Losses: Actual engines deal with mechanical friction between moving parts and heat losses through their walls. These things reduce efficiency and lead to deviations from the ideal cycle.
  2. Incomplete Combustion: Unlike in theory, not all of the air-fuel mixture in the cylinder burns completely. Some fuel remains unburned, leading to lower pressure and temperature levels than the ideal model predicts.
  3. Valve Timing and Flow Disrupts: Actual engines often struggle with imperfect valve timing and flow restrictions in their intake and exhaust systems. These issues make it harder for the engine to breathe efficiently.
  4. Knocking and Detonation: Knocking and detonation can sometimes interrupt the combustion process, causing pressure spikes that don’t align with the ideal model.
  5. Handling Different Loads: Actual engines have to deal with varying load conditions, which affect the shape of the P-V diagram. Light and heavy loads create different pressure and volume relationships.
Want to buy some clothes or electronics goods? Click here


So, while the theoretical P-V diagram offers a simplified way to understand the engine’s thermodynamics, the actual P-V diagram acknowledges the real-world challenges and imperfections. Things like friction, heat losses, incomplete combustion, valve timing issues, and load variations contribute to the gaps between these two diagrams.
These variations are used by engineers and scientists to optimize engine designs, increase efficiency, and to reduce their effects on the environment. Recognizing and exploring the divide between theory and practice drive advancements in engine technology, propelling the automotive and industrial sectors forward.

These simple assumptions and losses lead to the fact that the enclosed area (workdone) of the PV diagram for an actual engine is significantly smaller than the area (workdone) enclosed by the PV diagram of the ideal cycle. In other words, the ideal engine cycle will overvalue the area (workdone) if the engines run at the same speed, so greater power will be produced by the actual engine by around 20%.

It is essential to comprehend the details of the P-V diagram to enhance engine performance and keep up with the evolving world of internal combustion engines.

Check Other Questions That was asked in Nius Butwal. Click here.

Related Post